Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Lodging Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff seeks board input on short‑term lodging ordinance rewrite; audit and enforcement debated
Summary
Planning staff presented a redraft of the short‑term lodging ordinance to make permitted zones and special‑exception criteria clearer and to add an annual audit requirement; the board debated the enforceability of an audit and possible inspection rights.
Planning staff presented a revised short‑term lodging ordinance draft designed to clarify language on where short‑term lodging is permitted, special‑exception criteria and reporting requirements. The draft also adds an annual audit requirement so short‑term lodging operators report the number of days the property was rented, a measure staff says will help enforcement of maximum‑days provisions.
Staff and board members stressed that the proposed rewrite is primarily language cleanup intended to make existing rules more understandable, not a wholesale policy change. Staff said the draft clarifies that the audit is targeted at non‑owner‑occupied multifamily structures where rental of units reduces the supply of long‑term housing.
Board members raised several enforcement concerns: auditors and third‑party data may not produce reliable day‑counts and operators could underreport. A board member suggested language giving the city the right to inspect properties for usage and to pursue legal remedies if audits are materially inaccurate; staff said they will consult legal on whether inspection rights and enforcement tools can be strengthened. Members discussed whether changing the maximum‑days threshold (for example, from short‑stay weekends to two‑week minimum stays) would make enforcement easier but also acknowledged tax definitions (rooms and meals tax thresholds) and unintended effects on boarding‑house or month‑to‑month rentals.
Staff said they have received only a few formal complaints in the last year but noted the issue is a source of public interest in surrounding communities; staff invited board input and asked members to return comments to the planning office in time for an April public hearing. Staff said they will ask legal about options for inspections and enforcement language.
Ending — Staff will incorporate board feedback, consult legal about possible inspection/enforcement language and bring an updated draft and public hearing notice for the board to consider at its April meeting.
