Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the E Rate Networking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff present E‑Rate bids, network resiliency options and a device‑collection plan
Summary
Technology director presented two main Category 1 vendor routes (Comcast shared EPL vs. MetroNet leased/dark fiber), Category 2 bids for switches/wireless, current E‑Rate funding for the cycle and a plan to collect student devices by grade for inventory and reissue.
Kyle Frizzi, director of technology for West Aurora School District 129, briefed the board Feb. 18 on the district's final E‑Rate cycle, competitive bids for wide-area network resiliency and an upcoming device-collection plan.
The nut graf: Frizzi described two main network strategies — a lower-cost shared path offered by Comcast (an EPL-style managed product) and a MetroNet least-dark/leasing option that would place private fiber to provide greater resiliency and flexibility — and said the district would use remaining Category 2 E‑Rate funding to complete last-mile upgrades in the current cycle.
Frizzi said the district is drawing down the last of the current E‑Rate cycle and that category-discount levels increased this year to about 90% for Category 1 and 85% for Category 2 (as presented). He described two Category 1 elements: a point-to-point resilient path between the district office and the high school, and a wide-area network connecting 21 sites. For the point-to-point path, Comcast proposed an EPL managed circuit and MetroNet proposed leased/dark fiber; the quoted example prices in his presentation were roughly $113/month (Comcast after discount as shown) and $3,600/month (MetroNet before discount) for different options presented to the board.
Frizzi said MetroNet’s least-dark option would place private fiber along a more diverse trench route and provide the district with the ability to scale equipment and increase throughput later. “The advantages to this is it can be lower cost … and it allows for flexibility,” Frizzi said. He said MetroNet was offering a five‑year term with options to extend year‑by‑year later and that MetroNet includes in some proposals a resilient regional path at no additional cost.
Frizzi also reviewed Category 2 planned work (switch replacements, wireless access points and low-voltage cabling) and said the district’s bid submissions are being scored for a March 3 recommendation and a March 17 final approval. He listed vendor responses—Continental Resources offering a comprehensive package (switches, firewalls, UPS, cabling), CDW offering firewall licensing but missing cabling and UPS, and other proposals under review.
Frizzi described a device-collection plan: collect devices from third-, fifth- and eighth-graders before summer to improve inventory control and reissue fresh devices (Chromebooks) when students advance grades. He said the district cycles devices on a roughly four-year rotation by cohort (elementary iPads for K–3; Chromebooks in upper elementary; four-year cycles in middle and high school).
Board questions focused on route diversity, hub locations and the tradeoffs between MetroNet’s private fiber and Comcast’s managed service. Frizzi said both options are business-class but that MetroNet’s leased fiber gives the district control over equipment and potentially greater long-term flexibility. He said final vendor scoring will be presented to the board on March 3, with a final approval vote expected March 17.
Ending: Frizzi asked for questions and closed by saying he will return with a scoring matrix and firm recommendations at the March meetings so the board can vote on the vendor awards.
