Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates restricting student cell phone use amid possible state pilot; no policy change made
Summary
Hillsborough school board members discussed a proposed amendment to prohibit cell phone use at lunch in high schools, reacted to a state Senate bill proposing a pilot program, and raised enforcement and equity concerns; board did not adopt a change but asked staff for additional principal feedback and a survey.
The Hillsborough County School Board spent an extended portion of its policy workshop debating whether to ban student cell phone use at lunch in high schools and how the district should respond if the Florida Legislature authorizes pilot programs.
Member Gray proposed amending Policy 5136 to remove a provision that currently allows high school students to use phones at lunch, citing student safety, bullying and mental-health concerns. "We know the human trafficking do[es] grooming through phones," Gray said, urging preparation if state bills move forward. Staff and several board members responded that enforcement would be the key challenge.
District Chief of Schools Dr. Graves told the board enforcement is the primary barrier because a single lunch period can include hundreds of students: "For schools having the human capital to be able to enforce…that would be the barrier," he said, recommending any new rule be implemented over a summer orientation period. Several board members and staff noted that principals and high-school administrators told them the current policy has worked this year and they have not reported widespread problems tied specifically to lunch-time phone use.
Board Member Combs, who visits schools frequently, said large high schools with 2,500–3,000 students could not practically enforce a strict ban during lunch and worried about unintended consequences including theft of confiscated phones. Board Member Washington and others with prior school leadership experience recounted past efforts to remove phones and said enforcement burden and resulting discipline load led administrators to permit limited phone use.
Board members discussed two bills referenced during the meeting: Senate Bill 1296 (sponsored by Senator Burgess), which would direct the state Department of Education to set up a pilot program selecting small, medium and large districts to study a phone ban and require a December 2026 report; and House Bill 949, which at the time had no companion bill and no committee activity. District counsel said SB 1296 had no committee assignments and no movement yet; staff noted a bill text could include an effective date of July 1 if adopted.
Several board members favored waiting for additional data and recommended that the district not volunteer to be a pilot site for the state program. Vice Chair Vaughn said the board should survey high school principals to see how the current policy is working and asked the superintendent to gather principal feedback and return it to the board. Member Combs suggested smaller operational alternatives such as phone “pockets” in classrooms and increased support for the existing high-school policy.
No formal motion or vote was recorded at the workshop. Board members agreed to collect more principal input, consider an updated principal survey, and decline participation in a state pilot if district principals do not support it.
