Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety And Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent raises seclusion-room complaint during public comment; board pledges written response
Summary
A Box Elder County resident told the board his autistic son was improperly isolated in a room; the parent said district staff had not met with him and sought accountability. The board said it would respond within 24 hours and provide a written reply at the next regular meeting if further study is required.
During the public-comment portion of the meeting a resident identified as Mr. Norton told the Box Elder School District board he had repeatedly requested a meeting with board members and the superintendent about an incident involving his autistic son and a seclusion room.
Mr. Norton said he had not received a meeting and described the incident to trustees, saying staff repeatedly opened and slammed the seclusion-room door while his son was trying to fall asleep. He characterized the district’s lack of direct response to his meeting requests as a failure of “integrity” and “responsibility.”
The nut graf: the speaker urged the board to meet with him so he could share concerns about procedures and accountability for student treatment; board representatives told Mr. Norton the district would provide a response the following day and, if additional study is needed, a written reply would be read publicly at the next regular board meeting.
Board reaction was limited and procedural. After Mr. Norton finished, a board member said, “We will respond to you tomorrow.” The superintendent and board staff also said they had discussed the matter and would review his correspondence.
Ending: Mr. Norton said he would continue to attend meetings until he received a direct response; the board recorded the commitment to reply within one business day and to provide a written public response at the next meeting if warranted.
