Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Safe Haven topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee deadlocks and later postpones bill to extend Colorado safe‑haven surrender window to 30 days
Summary
Sponsors sought to increase the legal relinquishment window from 72 hours to 30 days and considered adding ‘newborn safety device’ language, but an amendment removed devices and the committee ultimately voted to postpone HB 25-1257 indefinitely after mixed testimony from public‑safety, medical and reproductive‑justice witnesses.
Rep. Kelty told the House Health and Human Services Committee she proposed HB 25‑1257 to give mothers more time and options to safely relinquish newborns, and said amendments removed language about infant‑abandonment devices so the bill would focus on extending the current 72‑hour surrender window to 30 days.
Supporters — including adopters, foster‑care advocates, maternal‑health clinicians and physicians — said extending the window would give vulnerable parents more time to recover from the immediate postpartum period and make a considered decision rather than resorting to unsafe abandonment. “Allowing parents this 30‑day time period allows them to get past the baby blues or the fourth trimester… and make a clear decision,” said Sarah Tomlinson, a licensed professional counselor who works in hospital pediatrics and the NICU.
Opponents and monitors raised different concerns: some reproductive‑justice and community organizations asked that impacted communities be more thoroughly consulted and warned the bill could be used as an anti‑abortion wedge; others raised operational or implementation questions about how fire stations, hospitals and child‑welfare agencies would handle any newborn safety devices and longer reporting windows.
Nut graf: The committee considered an amendment (L001) that struck proposed language on infant safety devices and limited the change to expanding the surrender timeframe to a maximum of 30 days; the amendment was adopted. The committee later failed to advance the amended bill and, after further procedural motions, voted to postpone HB 25‑1257 indefinitely.
What witnesses said
Proponents described cases of unsafe abandonment and mourning families who said a longer, uniform window would avert tragedies. Alyssa Hirsch, who said her daughter was a safe‑haven surrender, told the committee that “people still abandon their babies in horrific ways” and that a longer legal window could save lives.
Doctors and mental‑health clinicians argued the immediate postpartum period involves steep hormonal shifts, sleep deprivation and physical recovery that can impair decision‑making; Whitney Frost, a maternal‑mental‑health expert, testified that those factors can produce transient but serious cognitive effects in newly postpartum parents.
Opponents led by community organizations such as COLOR (Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights) and Elephant Circle urged caution, asked for broader community engagement, and warned any expansion should not be framed as a replacement for reproductive‑health services, housing assistance, mental‑health and substance‑use treatment.
Formal actions and votes
- L001 (strike language about infant safety devices and focus on extending the surrender timeframe to 30 days) was presented by Rep. Kelty and adopted by the committee during the amendment phase. Outcome: adopted.
- Motion to move HB 25‑1257 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation was made by Rep. Kelty and seconded. The committee roll call failed (the motion did not pass on the committee’s vote).
- A subsequent motion to postpone HB 25‑1257 indefinitely was made and seconded; the committee approved the motion to postpone indefinitely on a roll call vote of 9–4.
Why it mattered
Supporters said the bill aligns Colorado with the majority of states that allow a longer surrender window and that the change would reduce illegal abandonment and infant fatalities. Opponents and some committee members said implementation details — including consultation with community groups and operational coordination with departments such as the Colorado Department of Human Services — needed more work before the policy should advance.
Ending
After hours of testimony in a late‑night hearing the committee decided not to advance HB 25‑1257; sponsors were encouraged to continue stakeholder work. Committee members who opposed advancing the bill said they wanted time for state agencies and affected community groups to weigh in on implementation questions.
