Public and commissioners press for permanent inspector general, debate subpoena authority

Several public commenters and commissioners told the Independent Civilian Advisory Commission that San Mateo County needs a permanent inspector general to provide independent oversight of the Sheriff's Office and to increase transparency.

Resident David Valerga said the public "needs a permanent inspector general, preferably with subpoena power," arguing that a permanent office would help the commission and public access information. Bill Newell and other speakers made similar recommendations during public comment.

Commissioners asked about subpoena power for contracted inspector generals. County staff said the Board of Supervisors currently holds subpoena authority and, based on prior Board deliberations, intended to retain that power. Staff said an inspector general contracted by the county would not automatically have independent subpoena authority; the inspector general would need Board approval to issue subpoenas, likely on a case-by-case basis, and that approval could occur at a public meeting or possibly in closed session depending on legal considerations.

Why it matters: Independent investigatory authority, including subpoena power, affects whether an inspector general can compel evidence and testimony necessary for meaningful oversight. Commenters said deputies and members of the public need an independent avenue to raise concerns.

Ending: The commission noted public support for an inspector general with investigative authority and recorded staff guidance that subpoena power would remain with the Board of Supervisors unless the board decides otherwise. Commissioners asked staff to bring additional information about how subpoena requests and approvals would work.