Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters press council on contractor payments, Renaissance Fair success and homelessness options
Summary
During public comment the council heard from a contractor seeking retainage payment on a Crane Creek contract, the organizer of the Brevard Renaissance Fair thanking staff and describing economic impacts, and multiple residents urging broader homelessness solutions rather than short stays.
Three public‑comment topics drew council attention on Feb. 25: a contractor seeking final retainage on a completed Crane Creek golf‑course contract, praise and an economic impact summary from the Brevard Renaissance Fair organizer, and extended comments from residents and service providers about homelessness and Providence Place options.
Loretta Myers, identifying herself as representing Thomas Construction, said her company completed contract work on the Crane Creek golf course greens and driving range, including a change order completed on Sept. 26, and has not received retainage of $35,831.21. Myers said she and staff had exchanged paperwork repeatedly and that final paperwork issues delayed payment. City staff responded on the record that final payment had been authorized and was pending the check run scheduled for Feb. 27; staff emphasized the city could not issue payment without required documentation and that the finance department was processing the check run.
Peter Mulhausen, owner of the Brevard Renaissance Fair, told the council the multi‑week event drew nearly 100,000 visitors over six weeks, hosted an Education Day with about 3,000 students, and attracted performers and vendors from across the country and the world. He thanked city staff and the mayor and said local businesses — restaurants and hotels — saw strong economic spillover from the event.
Several speakers addressed homelessness and a proposed Providence Place or similar projects. One resident, Richard, said the Providence Place model is not guaranteed to house people experiencing homelessness because eligibility criteria are similar to other affordable‑housing programs; he urged county‑wide coordination and more mental‑health and longer‑term treatment options. Another speaker referenced opioid‑related funding and said new board efforts are considering 90‑day residential models with wraparound services rather than very short interventions. Councilmembers acknowledged the complexity of homelessness responses, said they would compile public comments and bring material for future agenda consideration, and reminded residents that county and regional partners are also involved in service planning.
City staff and council reiterated the processes available: staff said final contractor payments require correct, auditable paperwork; finance said the final payment in the Thomas Construction case had been authorized and was awaiting the scheduled check run; staff also offered to have the city engineer meet the contractor to walk through paperwork if needed.
