Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes Action Items topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves three action items including easement agreements and generator replacement; vote tallies recorded
Summary
At its March 4 meeting the Winston‑Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education approved three action items: (1) optional summer remediation and retesting (approved 7–2), (2) RJ Reynolds exterior lighting / Duke Energy easement agreements (unanimous), and (3) Winston‑Salem Prep generator replacement contract (unanimous). The two latter items had no
Get email alerts on the Board Votes Action Items topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Winston‑Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education on March 4 approved three action items during its business meeting, recording vote outcomes for each.
Votes at a glance - Optional summer remediation and retesting proposal — Motion by Board member Susan Miller; seconded by Board member Watts. Board announcement: “Motion passes 7 to 2.” The measure authorizes optional remediation and retesting on May 27–28, with child nutrition and transportation provided; excludes renormed science tests and certain high‑school EOCs. (See separate coverage for full debate and implementation details.)
- RJ Reynolds exterior lighting — Duke Energy easement agreements — Motion made by a board member (name not specified on the record); seconded by Board member Crowley. The board voted unanimously to approve the easement agreements for exterior lighting at RJ Reynolds High School. Meeting minutes record the motion as “Motion passes unanimously.”
- Winston‑Salem Prep generator replacement contract — Motion by Board member Crowley; seconded by a board member (name not specified on the record). The board voted unanimously to approve a contract to replace the generator at Winston‑Salem Preparatory Academy; the motion passed with no recorded opposition.
Formal actions recorded in the meeting transcript list the three approvals in sequence. The meeting did not provide detailed discussion for the two facility items; both passed by unanimous voice vote as recorded by the chair.

