Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Liens topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Palm Bay special magistrate approves reductions or payment plans for four code-enforcement liens

2511847 · February 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Special Magistrate James Beetle approved reduced payment amounts or deadlines for four properties with code-enforcement liens to allow owners or representatives to satisfy debts and proceed with sales or repairs. City staff supported the reductions provided administrative fees were paid.

Special Magistrate James Beetle, the official appointed by the City of Palm Bay to hear requests for reductions of code-enforcement liens, approved reduced payment amounts or extended deadlines for four properties during a special magistrate hearing in Palm Bay.

The reductions were requested by property owners or their representatives; city code-compliance staff recommended percentage reductions in each case but insisted administrative processing fees be paid. The rulings reduce outstanding liens to amounts the magistrate said owners could pay within specified deadlines so properties could proceed with sales or repairs.

In the first case, CB22774-22 at 1095 Heath Avenue NW, the city reported a total lien of $21,559.42 and recommended a 13% reduction plus a $750 administrative fee, for a proposed total of $3,552.72. John Scalia, a realtor who said he works with eXp, told the magistrate he intended to address compliance so the property could close. Valerie Pazin, the city's code compliance division manager, testified the city "has no objection to the reduction of the lien. The amount total is $21,559.42. We are seeking 13% ... plus the $750 administration fee." The magistrate approved the reduction and ordered payment within the normal 30-day window.

In the second matter, CEB22948-22 at 1154 Merrick Avenue NW, Jill Gombos, who identified herself as the neighbor and the property owner's power of attorney, described that the vehicle that triggered the violation had been removed after the owner became aware. The city's position, presented by Pazin, listed the lien at $13,747.33 and proposed 14% ($1,924.62) plus the $750 administrative fee, totaling $2,674.62. The magistrate reduced the amount to $2,500 and allowed a 90-day payment period; the magistrate warned that if the payment is not made in the time ordered the original lien amount could be reinstated.

The third case, 3CEB16388-13 at 2547 Hover Hill Road NE, involved property owner Jonathan Ponce. The city's record showed a total lien of $9,951.14; city staff sought a 13% reduction ($1,293.65) plus the $750 administrative fee for a total of $2,043.65, and said the property had been put into compliance on May 8, 2014. The magistrate reduced the amount to $1,575 and ordered payment within 30 days, reiterating that failure to pay as ordered will reinstate the full lien.

In the final matter, CB22952-22 at 339 Wilton Avenue SW, a caller identifying herself as Olivia of Circular, the property owner, said she learned of the lien only when a title company discovered it while processing a sale and that the offending boat was removed within seven days of her learning of the violation. The city reported a total outstanding lien of $43,929.40 and recommended 11% ($4,832.23) plus the $750 administrative fee for a total of $5,582.23. The magistrate approved the city's recommended percentage and fee, entered the order for $5,582.23, and extended the normal payment period to 45 days to accommodate the owner's circumstances.

Across the hearing, Pazin told the magistrate that the city "has no objection to the reduction" in each case provided the administrative fee is collected. Beetle emphasized standard payment windows (commonly 30 days), allowed longer periods in two cases, and repeatedly warned that failure to pay within the ordered timeframe would result in reinstatement of the original lien amounts.

The clerk administered oaths to witnesses at the start of each matter, applicants or their representatives presented testimony describing property circumstances (tenants leaving trash, parked vehicles, difficulty removing items from properties, and late discovery of liens during sale processes), and city staff provided ledger totals and the percentage reductions they recommended. Each case closed with the magistrate signing an order that will be provided to the city for processing. The session adjourned at 1:31 p.m.