Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surveillance Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident raises privacy concerns about Flock surveillance cameras at busy intersection
Summary
A resident told the council the city’s Flock automatic license‑plate reader cameras near Newcastle Way and Coal Creek Parkway create extensive records of vehicle movements and posed constitutional and litigation risks, citing a related Norfolk, Va. federal court opinion.
During the March 4 meeting’s public comment period, resident Steven Vimes urged the council to reconsider the city’s use of Flock Systems cameras and raised privacy and legal concerns.
Vimes said four of the city’s six Flock cameras are clustered near the Newcastle Way/Coal Creek Parkway intersection and that the system records vehicle locations multiple times daily for regular drivers. “This violation of rights is the basis of a lawsuit happening right now against Norfolk, Virginia,” Vimes said, and he quoted a court passage he said raised Carpenter‑era privacy questions about prolonged tracking. He urged the council to consider safeguards, transparency and possible limits to avoid similar legal exposure.
City Manager Pingel acknowledged the resident’s communication and said he would forward concerns to the sheriff’s office; Vimes asked the council itself to discuss policy because council sets policy and the public looks to it for oversight.
Why it matters: Automated license‑plate readers collect location data that can create long-term records of residents’ movements. A pending and publicly reported federal lawsuit against Norfolk was cited by the speaker as a legal precedent raising questions about reasonable expectations of privacy.
Next steps: The resident requested council attention and policy safeguards. Staff indicated it had forwarded correspondence to the sheriff’s office and will include the topic in future policy conversations if directed by council.
