Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Driver Training Innovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Insurer-backed proposal would allow telematics-based driver training as optional pathway
Summary
Grange Insurance and other witnesses proposed an amendment to HB 96 to permit telematics and app-based tools to satisfy some behind-the-wheel training requirements, preserving in-person instructor options while seeking Department of Public Safety approval for technology used in instruction.
A private-sector witness told the committee an amendment to the budget bill would allow technology-based telematics tools to be used as an optional means for teens to meet parts of Ohio's driver-training requirements.
Jason Rather, AVP of innovation at Grange Insurance, described technology that could validate parental practice hours, recommend safe practice routes, and provide telematics feedback on speed and control to complement traditional in-car instruction. Rather said the amendment would not change statutory driver-safety goals or remove the licensed-adult or instructor oversight requirement; instead it would allow Department of Public Safety review and approval of telematics platforms as an alternative, optional tool.
Lawmakers and members asked how the technology would ensure safe, supervised behind-the-wheel training and whether the state would incur long-term costs for technology maintenance. Rather said private firms would provide the platforms and that privacy controls would leave consumers in control of data sharing; he said the amendment would include a public-safety review requirement and would preserve consumers' choice of traditional driving schools.
Committee members raised concerns about accuracy, equity of access and parental competence as instructors; witnesses proposed safeguards such as DPS approval, privacy protections, and pilot programs. The witness emphasized the proposal would be optional and not replace licensed driving instructors.
