Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development Craft Beverages topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Floor debate on bill easing limits for Nebraska craft breweries and microdistilleries highlights industry and constitutional questions

2506449 · March 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators debated LB 113, which would loosen caps on retail locations and self-distribution for Nebraska craft breweries and microdistilleries; the General Affairs Committee adopted a compromise amendment in committee but constitutional and market concerns were raised on the floor.

Lincoln, Neb. — Senators spent significant floor time debating LB 113, a General Affairs Committee bill that would increase the number of retail/tasting locations craft breweries and microdistilleries may operate and raise the cap on how many gallons microdistilleries can self-distribute annually.

Senator Tom Quick introduced LB 113, saying the bill would help Nebraska craft-beverage businesses expand and reach customers. As introduced the bill would have increased allowed retail locations from five to ten and raised a microdistillery's self-distribution limit from 500 gallons to 5,000 gallons per year. The General Affairs Committee adopted a compromise amendment (AM 2 32) that reduced those increases: the amendment allows up to eight retail locations and raises the self-distribution cap to 3,500 gallons per year for microdistilleries.

Sponsor Senator Justin Holcroft said the amendment balances concerns about preserving the three-tier alcohol distribution system with opportunities for small-business growth. He told senators the committee voted 8-0 to adopt the amendment in committee and advanced the bill from committee.

Opponents on the floor raised questions about constitutional exposure under the dormant commerce clause and whether the state could be providing differential treatment that favors in-state businesses over out-of-state competitors. Senator Jenni Raybould said she requested an Attorney General opinion on Feb. 18 asking whether the bill could create differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests; she told the floor the AG opinion had not been released yet and that possibility of a constitutional challenge gave her concern.

Supporters argued the policy promotes small, homegrown Nebraska businesses and value-added agriculture (grain and water used in distilling). Senator Storer, Senator Anderson and others framed the measure as economic development and a tourism driver; Senator John Kavanaugh and others said past, smaller increases in self-distribution had not produced the intended economic lift and that a larger cap was required for some businesses to make self-distribution economically viable.

Several senators urged caution about the proposed volumes. Senator Clements noted the proposed increases represent a multiple of the current cap and warned against moving too quickly; Senator Jacobson said the legislature should "pull the reins back" and voiced opposition to the amendment and bill. Senator Kavanaugh and other supporters said the compromise amendment (3,500 gallons and eight locations) was designed to strike a middle ground.

The floor record shows robust debate but no recorded final floor vote on AM 2 32 or on the underlying bill before the session adjourned for the day; the transcript records only the committee's unanimous (8-0) committee-level adoption of AM 2 32 and that the bill was placed on general file with committee amendments. Senator Quick said distillers already self-collect taxes at current limits and expected compliance at higher caps.

The debate signals continuing negotiations ahead of a floor vote and a likely request to the Attorney General for a constitutional review that some senators had already sought.