Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves two Becker Hoppe amendments for façade concepts and siphon construction support
Summary
The board approved $11,700 to study facade alternatives for the Wasatch Downtown Mall Sears ramp and approved an estimated time-and-materials amendment for construction-administration assistance on the Washington Street siphon project estimated at $17,510.
Get email alerts on the Planning And Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Public Works approved two amendments on Tuesday with Becker Hoppe to support separate projects: facade concept work for the Wasatch Downtown Mall and construction-administration assistance for the Washington Street siphon replacement project.
For the Wasatch Downtown Mall redevelopment, staff described a request to develop facade alternatives on the north side of the Sears ramp. The scope reported to the board was two concept options and associated cost estimates; staff recorded the additional cost at $11,700. A board member moved to approve the $11,700 amendment to allow Becker Hoppe and Miller Dunwiddie to develop facade alternatives; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.
Separately, the board approved Amendment 2 to Becker Hoppe’s agreement for the Washington Street siphon replacement project to provide construction-administration assistance. Staff said the work will include document review and periodic site inspections at points when additional specialist oversight is needed; city staff expect to perform most site work. The amendment was described as time-and-materials and was presented with an estimated total of $17,510; staff clarified the figure is an estimate and not a not-to-exceed amount. A motion to approve the amendment was seconded and approved.
Meeting remarks indicate the siphon-assistance amendment will supplement city staff during lift-station startup and other critical points in the project. The transcript records voice approvals but no roll-call tallies.

