Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Academics Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nelson County reports winter gains; district to expand standardized ELA and Illustrative Math pilots
Summary
District staff told the Nelson County Board of Education on March 4 that winter I‑Ready results show midyear growth in several grades and that the district will expand pilot curricula—EL for ELA and Illustrative Math—while adding instructional-design leads and summer professional development.
Nelson County school officials reported midyear academic gains on March 4 and outlined plans to expand districtwide curriculum pilots and professional development.
Courtney Newton, identified in the meeting as director of 6–12 schools, said winter I‑Ready scores compared with last May’s KSA results show about 6% growth in middle‑school ELA and roughly 16% growth in middle‑school math. Newton said high‑school results are more modest: about 1% projected growth in reading and roughly 2% in math when winter I‑Ready is compared to last year’s spring KSA scores. Newton said those figures represent changes in the percentage of students scoring at the district’s proficiency/distinguished levels, not individual student gains.
Why it matters: staff framed the gains as a check on current priorities — classroom culture, standards alignment and “measuring what matters” — and as input for staffing and professional learning decisions before next school year.
Newton described steps the district will take to build on the gains. The district plans to expand the EL for ELA pilot (currently in middle school and showing success at some elementary levels) and to maintain a tier‑1 focus on core instruction. “So tier 1 is that instruction that everybody gets in the classroom. That’s the initial instruction,” Newton said, explaining the district’s tiered support model and how tier‑2 and tier‑3 interventions are used when students do not meet grade‑level expectations.
The district completed a full implementation of Illustrative Math (IM) at the middle‑school level this year and plans to extend IM into high school. Newton said next year’s IM work will prioritize mathematical discourse and application to real‑world problems. Liana, introduced as the district’s instructional design lead for math, will assist teachers in piloting and co‑designing lessons before a deeper weeklong professional development in the summer focused on alignment to standards and using assessment data to guide instruction.
Board members pressed for context about what explains the math gains and how curriculum choices were made. Newton said the district evaluated four or five publishers, reviewed external validations, and prioritized curricula with research ratings validated by external studies. She emphasized the district is not mandating a single approach without local adaptation and that some restructuring (not new positions) will place content experts and instructional‑design leads where they can support teachers across grade bands.
The presentation included elementary midyear indicators showing many K–2 reading and K–4 math grades in a “high growth” band relative to national I‑Ready norms; staff cautioned that winter figures are provisional and that spring administration will provide a clearer picture.
Board members and administrators tied the curriculum and staffing discussion to other priorities — literacy micro‑credentials, a Kentucky numeracy program beginning in June, and alignment with state expectations — and said the district will use the remainder of the school year and summer training to prepare for broader rollout.
The presentation and board discussion did not produce formal board action on curriculum adoption during the March 4 working session.
Ending: District officials said they will return to the board with additional implementation details, summer professional‑development plans and spring assessment results.
