Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board opens review of promotion/retention policy after reports of 51 students under SBIT review
Summary
Board members asked for a presentation and longitudinal data after staff reported 47 SBIT meetings this year concerning 51 students not meeting grade-level standards; the district uses SBIT interventions and sometimes identifies students for special education or 504 plans through that process.
The King George County School Board opened a review of its promotion and retention policy after district staff reported substantial screening and intervention activity for students not meeting grade-level standards.
Superintendent David Boyd described the regulation and current practice: teachers and school staff convene a Student-Based Intervention Team (SBIT) when a student is performing below standards; an initial meeting is required before the end of the first semester and interventions are maintained through the second semester. At the end of the process, if interventions have not closed the gap, administrators and staff weigh promotion versus retention.
Boyd told the board that, in the 2024–25 school year so far, elementary-level SBIT teams have held 47 meetings regarding 51 students who are not meeting grade-level standards. Reasons for referrals included suspected disabilities, attendance problems, behavior and illness. Boyd said some students found through the process became eligible for special education or 504 plans, and others made sufficient progress after intervention. He said many of these students are receiving tier 2 and tier 3 interventions.
Board members asked for further presentation and data. Member David Bush cautioned against “automatic social promotion,” urging that retaining students who have not mastered curriculum should be considered when educationally appropriate, while balancing social and developmental concerns. Board members requested longitudinal outcome data—how retained students fared later in their schooling—and asked staff to present alternatives and intervention evidence.
Ending
Superintendent Boyd said staff will prepare a presentation with longitudinal data, intervention options and research on early identification and alternatives to retention; the board signaled support for a data-driven review before updating the 2014 policy and regulations.
