Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Storm Debris Cleanup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Augusta commissioners press staff and contractors on months-long storm debris and fallen-sign cleanup; FEMA reimbursement window noted
Summary
Commissioners pressed engineering, code enforcement and ISM debris contractors for clearer plans after 150+ days of post-Hurricane Helene cleanup. Staff reported prioritization rules for sign repair and that categories A and B debris work is being submitted for FEMA reimbursement; the 100% reimbursement window was stated as March 23, 2025.
Commissioners raised repeated concerns at the March 4 meeting about signs, grocery carts, trash and storm debris still visible more than five months after Hurricane Helene, and asked staff to present an accelerated, citywide cleanup plan.
Commissioner Catherine Smith Rice opened a broad discussion about right-of-way clutter — commercial signs nailed to telephone poles, median litter, damaged traffic signs and grocery carts — and pressed engineering staff for a timetable. Dr. Malik of the city’s engineering staff said sign repairs and replacements are prioritized: safety signs (those with red) first, then warning signs, then guidance and informational signs. He said the city’s sign crew is a three-person crew that is completing essential work while handling normal duties; engineering will compile costs and bring an estimate back to the commission.
Deputy administration and code enforcement officials reported progress: code enforcement said two focused sign-pull efforts (December and February) removed 2,499 signs from medians, rights of way and telephone poles and covered 278 miles of roadway in those sweeps. Director Delaney’s code compliance manager said inspectors observe problem areas and assign pick-up zones; the manager also noted teams must return frequently because new signs reappear.
Commissioners and staff discussed confusion between debris removed under the city’s FEMA public assistance process and what the city’s contracted solid-waste haulers are required to collect. ISM contractor Steve Castle explained debris categories: vegetative debris (tree limbs), root balls (handled separately because they damage grinders), and construction-demolition debris (fencing, siding, roofing) that typically goes to landfill. He said crews finished vegetative debris and are working through root-ball extraction and C&D in sequence; mixing categories can make loads ineligible for certain processing routes.
Dr. Malik and ISM said the city has submitted debris information to FEMA (via GMC and TetraTech) for reimbursement and that the 100% reimbursement window referenced in the meeting would expire on or about March 23, 2025; staff said they were accelerating schedules and adding trucks to meet obligations.
Commissioners asked staff to coordinate with contract haulers (coastal/waste management and sub‑contractors): commissioners reported neighborhoods where bulk haulers had not shown and said the contract should be enforced. Dr. Malik said contractor performance is monitored, complaints are investigated and staff will meet both haulers to verify coverage and response. Several commissioners asked for a written plan and timeline; Dr. Malik said he would bring back cost estimates and a schedule at the next committee or full commission meeting, with possible reporting in May.
Staff and ISM also discussed cemetery cleanup and retention-pond hazards, noting some cemetery work requires coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office and archaeologists before root-ball extraction can proceed.
The commission accepted the updates as information and directed staff to deliver a coordinated cleanup plan, including ordinance changes if needed to strengthen enforcement and options for working with contracted haulers.
