Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Design Exception topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves major design exception ADMD-000018-2025

2494413 · February 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Cedar Rapids Board of Adjustment approved a major design exception (ADMD-000018-2025) by voice vote; three members were present and the chair advised three affirmative votes were required.

The Cedar Rapids Board of Adjustment approved a major design exception, ADMD-000018-2025, after a motion and second were put on the floor and the board voted in favor.

Board members voted by voice; the chair noted three affirmative votes are required for approval and that three of five members were present. A motion to approve the major design exception was made, seconded and the chair announced the motion carried. The chair directed the petitioner to follow up with the Building Services Department for next steps.

The board began the item with an explanation of the role of the board in reviewing variances and conditional-use requests under the city—s zoning ordinance, including that applicants must meet seven criteria for a variance and that the board considers whether a proposed use is appropriate for the surrounding area. The chair reiterated procedural rules: the chair may vote but cannot make motions and petitioners may request to table a case if fewer than five members are present, with no guarantee of a full board at the next meeting.

No public objectors were recorded in the portion of the transcript provided. The motion was made on the record as follows: "Mr. Chairman, I would make a motion to approve major design ADMD-000018-2025 as presented." That motion was seconded and the chair called for the vote; the chair announced "Motion carries." The chair advised the applicant to follow up with the Building Services Department.

There were no additional conditions, amendments, or roll-call vote details recorded in the excerpt provided.