Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Design Exception Setback topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves design exception to reduce front-yard setback for industrial building addition

2493963 · January 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Cedar Rapids Board of Adjustment granted a major design exception to allow a 3,800-square-foot addition to encroach into the front-yard setback, reducing the required 35-foot setback to 17.5 feet because of an existing utility easement adjacent to the site.

The Cedar Rapids Board of Adjustment voted to grant a major design exception that reduces a required 35-foot front-yard setback to 17.5 feet for an addition to an existing industrial facility.

The request, described by Development Services staff as a major design exception case number ADMD000870-2024 B, would allow a roughly 3,800-square-foot expansion onto a parcel of a little more than 3 acres containing an existing roughly 30,000-square-foot structure. Staff recommended approval on the basis that the proposal does not conflict with the comprehensive plan, represents a minimal deviation, and is reasonably necessary because a 20-foot-wide utility easement limits expansion to the west.

"This is for a cold storage expansion," said Tred Schnoor, an engineer with Schnoor Bonifazie Engineering, who asked the board to consider the practical constraint posed by a major telephone line within the utility easement. Schnoor said the owner has limited options to expand westward because of that easement.

Staff summarized the criteria the board must apply and concluded the request should be treated as a design exception rather than a rezoning. The staff presentation noted the addition would encroach “halfway into the threat and error setback” on the site plan and recommended approval.

A board member moved to grant the case. After a second, the board held a voice vote and the chair announced the motion carried.

Board members and staff instructed the applicant to follow up with Building Services for any necessary next steps.

Why it matters: The decision allows an industrial operator to expand where underground utilities constrain buildable area, and it sets the local administrative precedent for how the board applies the design-exception criteria when utility easements restrict expansion.

No public objections were recorded for this item during the hearing.