Port Orange council approves ordinances, consent items in unanimous votes
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Sign Up Free
Summary
The council approved consent items 5–10 and two ordinances on second reading (cross‑connection updates and a PUD amendment for Madeline Commons) by 5–0 roll calls; the Port Orange Property Development board also held its annual officer elections.
The Port Orange City Council approved a batch of consent agenda items and two ordinances on second reading in unanimous votes and conducted the annual meeting and officer elections for the Port Orange Property Development board.
The council approved consent agenda items 5 through 10 by roll call (vote 5–0). The meeting transcript does not provide text for each consent item in the public portion of the record; details for items 5–10 are not specified in the transcript and therefore are listed as not specified here.
On second reading the council unanimously approved Ordinance No. 2025‑07, which updates the city’s cross‑connection control code sections and references to the revised cross‑connection control manual, the Florida Administrative Code and the American Water Works Association manual and establishes inspection and testing frequencies. The motion passed on a 5–0 roll call.
The council also unanimously approved Ordinance No. 2025‑08, the first amendment to the Madeline Commons planned unit development master plan. The amendment removes the requirement to install a fence adjacent to Sugar Mill Elementary School; council members described the change as a beneficial swap and approved the ordinance on a 5–0 roll call.
Separately, the Port Orange Property Development annual meeting convened and elected board officers. The board nominated and approved Sean Gephart as chairman, Lance Green as vice chairman, Tracy Grubbs as president, Scott Stilter (name in transcript) as vice president, Jonathan Foley as secretary and Linda Truitt (assistant city finance director) as treasurer; each nomination was carried by voice vote as recorded in the meeting minutes.
The meeting record shows that the council’s votes were unanimous on the matters brought to roll call; the transcript did not provide mover/second names for the motions in each case, and where the agenda text was not read in the public hearing the items are summarized as not specified in this report.