Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Criminal Justice Council says state grant model returns $13 for every $1 in state funding; warns of federal cut risks
Summary
The Criminal Justice Council told the Joint Finance Committee that its grant work returned, on average, $13.30 in federal and foundation funding for every $1 of state support over the last three years, and warned that possible federal funding shifts could cut local awards.
The Criminal Justice Council (CJC) briefed the Joint Finance Committee on the council’s role as the state administering agency for federal criminal justice funds, its grant portfolio and recent program results. Executive Director Chris Kervick said the CJC has shifted strategic emphasis toward discretionary grants and grant writing capacity and described the council’s role in passing funding to hundreds of state and non‑profit service providers.
Money in, services out: The CJC reported that over the past three years it averaged roughly $15 million per year in grant awards and that for each $1 of state support to the council the office returned approximately $13.30 in external grant funds and services. Kervick said the council’s portfolio funds training, body‑worn camera purchases, reentry programs, victims’ services, law enforcement accreditation assistance and other initiatives. He also noted the council has used state VOCA (Victims of Crime Act) allocations to maintain victim services where federal VOCA award cycles had gaps.
Programs and impact highlights: The council said its federal grants supported 4,000 juvenile‑at‑risk services, more than 34,000 victim services and a suite of diversion, treatment, reentry and law‑enforcement training programs. The council also manages reimbursement programs (for law enforcement tuition and for local participation in presidential residence security details) and has supported accreditation for multiple state and local departments.
Federal funding risk and timeline: Kervick told committee members that potential federal funding changes in Washington could affect DOJ and related grant programs this fiscal year; he said a March continuing resolution or a larger federal package could change available awards and warned the council is preparing contingency plans. He also flagged a specific Homeland Security reimbursement stream (for protective details) that was zeroed out in a national spending proposal and said local law enforcement could lose roughly $2 million in expected reimbursements unless Congress restores those funds.
Statistical Analysis Center (SAC) work: CJC and SAC staff produce recurring analytics for the state. SAC director Felicia Wideline Crist summarized trend analyses showing declines in reported crime categories and documented decreases in probation and prison populations over the past decade. SAC staff reiterated measurement definitions and cautioned readers to compare metrics only when methodologies match; SAC explained that Delaware’s commonly used three‑year return‑to‑prison rate differs from other states’ measures and that direct comparisons require consistent definitions.
Why this matters: The CJC is a major conduit for federal dollars that support victims, law enforcement, community reentry programs and courts. Changes in federal appropriations and the end of one‑time pandemic grant streams could materially change local program capacity.
Ending note: The council asked lawmakers to continue permitting the agency to accept and administer federal grants and to allow the state share where required to sustain locally critical services; the council also asked for continued support for VOCA pass‑through funding to community providers during federal gaps.
