Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Small Business topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council considers interim use permit for myofascial-release therapy at 1121 South Minnesota Street

2493349 · March 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council reviewed a staff recommendation and planning commission conditions to allow a myofascial-release therapy business to operate from a basement bedroom at a single-family home; the planning commission unanimously recommended a five-year interim use permit with conditions.

The New Ulm City Council heard a staff report and planning-commission recommendation on an interim use permit request to allow a myofascial-release therapy business to operate out of a single-family residence at 1121 South Minnesota Street.

Planner John Nisley told the council the operator would use an unused bedroom in a walkout basement and that the planning commission on Feb. 27 recommended unanimous approval with five conditions. Staff said the use would generate minimal traffic (one customer at a time) and that the home would remain a single-family dwelling; staff recommended a five-year interim use permit, renewable once for another five years.

The planning commission’s five recommended conditions, as read to council, were: compliance with interim-use standards in section 2.4(e) of the zoning ordinance; a five-year permit term; the use not expanding or moving from the identified location; the property owner paying the cost to record the resolution with the Brown County Recorder’s Office; and that the permit would be null and void upon change of ownership (a new owner would need to reapply).

Council members asked whether operating hours should be added as a formal condition; the applicant told staff proposed hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and staff said they did not list that as a mandatory condition because traffic impacts appeared minimal. The applicant and a staff member noted two phone inquiries and one email in opposition were received; staff said the email is included in the council packet but that the people who called asked only for clarification.

A resolution to approve the interim use permit with the planning-commission conditions was moved and seconded during the meeting. (The planning-commission recommendation and staff report are part of the record; council direction calls for recordation of the resolution and for permit conditions listed by staff.)