Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bellefonte officials outline property‑maintenance enforcement process, timelines
Summary
Building code staff described how the borough handles complaints about exterior maintenance, rental inspections, fire responses and shared examples of ongoing cases; staff emphasized efforts to work with owners before using citations or court action.
Walt Schneider, the borough’s building code official, told Bellefonte Borough Council at a March work session that property‑maintenance complaints are handled case‑by‑case and that staff try to work with property owners before pursuing enforcement.
Schneider said the Center Region building‑safety office (which handles building safety and property‑maintenance complaints) investigates reported problems and aims to give owners reasonable time to correct violations. “The first thing we have to do is look into the complaint. Is there a grounds behind the complaint?” Schneider said.
The office distinguishes zoning and nuisance complaints handled by the borough’s zoning officer or ordinance enforcement from maintenance issues his staff handles, Schneider said. He identified Rob Semien as the local inspector who performs rental housing and life‑safety inspections and named Mike Faustina as senior inspector for existing structures who can be called in as backup.
Schneider described a graduated enforcement approach: initial investigation and notice, a reasonable time to fix the problem (timing may vary with weather or the complexity of repairs), followed by successive notices with shorter deadlines and, if necessary, citations and court filings. He said inspectors try to resolve problems informally while ensuring due process, and that complainant names are not disclosed under the borough’s interpretation of right‑to‑know requirements where complaints are treated as confidential.
Schneider gave examples: a prolonged case near the baseball fields that he expects will proceed to building permits and redesign work after recent attorney discussions, and a former rental “gatehouse” at the academy that received a notice of violation after the tenant left and the owner declined repairs.
On rental housing, Schneider said inspections occur every three years and more often if complaints arrive. He described the office’s role in post‑fire responses: an inspector on call and coordination with senior staff to assess habitability and help displaced tenants get safe housing quickly.
Councilors and residents asked about enforcement of retaining walls and unlicensed vehicles. Schneider said retaining‑wall failures are often complex because ownership and responsibility can fall across multiple properties; staff seek cooperative solutions between owners and design professionals. He said vehicle matters — for example unlicensed vehicles left in yards — are generally handled by ordinance enforcement, although items stored against a building that affect the structure fall under building‑safety jurisdiction.
Schneider said his office has been providing services to Bellefonte for about 11 years and that staff aim to be responsive: “If we have somebody displaced… we were able to resolve it within an hour or two after the fact,” he said, describing post‑fire interventions. He encouraged residents to supply detailed information when reporting a complaint so staff can triage and investigate efficiently.
The work session discussion did not include any council votes; it was informational and intended to clarify roles, response timelines and enforcement tools.
