Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Technology Filtering topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Canyons parents show board how quickly porn appears on school accounts; board directs study for March 18
Summary
Parents demonstrated that pornographic content can be accessed quickly on Canyons-issued accounts and devices. After public comment the Board of Education directed staff to study filtering, whitelisting and interim restrictions and return with recommendations at the March 18 meeting.
Parents told the Canyons Board of Education on March 4 that school-issued accounts and district Wi‑Fi allow easy access to pornographic material, and the board asked staff to study possible technical and policy fixes and return with recommendations at its next meeting.
During the meeting Ally Terry, who identified herself as a parent, said she could locate pornographic videos “in less than 15 seconds and four clicks” while logged on to a Canyon School District account and browsing the district guest Wi‑Fi. Terry cited a Utah state code provision in support of stronger filtering and said the district’s current filters were “not compliant” with that law as she understands it. Parent Eric McFarland described personal family harm from early exposure to explicit material and urged the board to act so other students do not suffer similar harm.
The board responded in public session. President Schill said the board would require staff to study the concerns and present options at the March 18 board meeting. Superintendent Robbins and other administrators acknowledged parents’ reports and said staff would assemble technical and policy options. No formal vote was recorded on a policy change; the board’s instruction was recorded as a direction to administration.
Why this matters: Parents said they expected that district‑issued Chromebooks would block explicit material whether students used them at school or at home. The public comments and the board’s direction put the district on a timetable to return policy and technical options — including short‑term restrictions and longer‑term whitelisting or filtering changes — within two weeks.
What the board asked staff to prepare: Board discussion and staff comments indicate administrators will return with at least these items on March 18: evidence of the district’s current filtering configuration on school accounts and on guest Wi‑Fi; recommended short‑term interim steps to reduce student access during unmonitored time (for example, restricted “teacher‑guided” modes or temporary whitelists at elementary levels); an implementation plan and timeline for stronger filtering or whitelisting; and parent communications explaining opt‑in/out options and controls. Leon Wilcox (business administrator) and Superintendent Robbins indicated staff will compile existing technical logs and parent feedback as part of that report.
District context: Parents referenced a Utah statute during public comment (transcript excerpted it as “Utah State Code 53 …”), and speakers noted the legislature has been considering multiple bills that touch on student technology and school responsibilities. Board members said the issue crosses policy, operational and family‑education responsibilities and called for a coordinated plan that includes parent education and student safeguards.
Next steps: Administration will present findings and recommended actions at the March 18 board meeting. The board’s direction does not itself change district policy; any formal policy or fee changes would come back to the board for a vote. Meanwhile, parents and board members urged faster interim protections at elementary grades and stronger communications for families.
