Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Legislation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Huffman presses drag‑racing ordinance while police warn of state preemption, legal limits on seizures

2492915 · February 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilmember Huffman advanced an ordinance amending Metro Code chapter 12.16 to target drag racing; the committee voted 8-0 to recommend approval after discussion that the measure may be unenforceable under state law and that vehicle forfeiture rules complicate local seizure efforts.

An ordinance to amend chapter 12.16 of the Metropolitan Code related to drag racing (BL 20 25-743) advanced from the Public Health & Safety Committee on an 8-0 recommendation after a discussion about state preemption and the limits of local enforcement.

Sponsor Council Member Huffman told the committee the ordinance is intended to add penalties for street racing within Davidson County, including a 30‑day seizure and a $50 fine, but acknowledged the measure may be unenforceable under state law. Huffman said she is pursuing a parallel state‑level effort to clear local authority and that she intends to withdraw the bill at third reading if the state change does not occur: "If that does not on the state level to a current bill, if that does not work out, I do plan on withdrawing this on third." (Council Member Huffman).

Deputy Chief/Commander Gilder of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department explained challenges with vehicle forfeiture and seizure under current state law, noting the statutory forfeiture process is tied to criminal cases and can be difficult to execute when ownership or lienholders are involved. On impoundment and owner notification he said the department would document and notify the registered owner, and that local impoundment as proposed would be distinct from a forfeiture process: "This would not be a forfeiture process. This would be an impoundment." (Deputy Chief Gilder).

Council Member Bradford asked whether owners are notified when vehicles are impounded if they are not the arrested driver; Gilder said the department would document and notify owners and that impoundment could follow on repeated offenses once an owner had been notified. Council Member Nash noted that state law treats drag racing as a felony in some circumstances and questioned whether prosecution under state law remains preferable because of higher penalties.

Council Member Swara asked administration staff whether the measure would have effect given the preemption concern; a staff member replied: "The bill is preempted, so it won't have an effect 1 way or another." Huffman reiterated that she is pursuing state relief and would withdraw the bill if unsuccessful within about two weeks.

Action: the committee moved the ordinance forward by committee recommendation, 8 in favor, 0 opposed, 0 not voting.