Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voter Records And Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee unanimously advances overhaul to public voter‑registration record rules
Summary
The Senate committee unanimously advanced fourth substitute House Bill 270, a negotiated change to voter‑registration record rules that notifies private registrants and will make selected fields public beginning in January 2027 unless a registrant qualifies for an at‑risk withheld status.
The Senate Government Operations Political Subdivision Committee on March 3 unanimously favorably recommended fourth substitute House Bill 270, a measure that revises how voter‑registration records are handled and who receives access to which fields.
Representative Lee and Davis County Clerk Brian McKenzie presented the bill as the product of stakeholder negotiations among county clerks, political parties, candidates and the lieutenant governor’s office. The fourth substitute would notify voters currently marked as private about a future change and, beginning in January 2027 (coinciding with a planned new voter‑registration system), make certain registration fields public for voters who do not qualify as ‘‘at‑risk.’’ Publicly available fields would include voter ID number, address, party affiliation and election participation history. Political parties would receive names and age demographics for party‑related outreach; counties and clerks would retain processes to protect legitimately at‑risk voters (law‑enforcement officers, domestic‑violence victims, deployed military members and others) who meet statutory criteria.
McKenzie said the later 2027 effective date was purposeful: Utah is replacing its legacy voter registration system (VISTA) and the new system roll‑out reduces the number of software changes and fiscal impact. The Utah Republican Party’s chair and multiple county clerks testified in favor of the bill; a few public commenters — including veterans and privacy advocates — raised concerns about the removal of blanket privacy by default for some registrants and recommended protections for military personnel.
The committee adopted a fourth substitute and then voted to favorably recommend the measure to the full Senate; the committee chair announced the substitute passed unanimously.
