Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Boma Votes Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board of Mayor and Aldermen votes: rock-crushing permit rules, resolutions and consent items

2490247 · February 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Spring Hill Board approved interim rules on on-site rock crushing with an amendment, deferred commerce-center items, passed several resolutions including opposition to Tennessee HB 0895, authorized a state revolving loan application and approved multiple consent items; one resolution about an election matter passed with a recorded split vote.

The Board of Mayor and Aldermen of Spring Hill took votes on a mix of consent items, development matters and policy resolutions during this meeting. Key outcomes include unanimous approval of a consent agenda covering routine items, approval of interim permitting requirements for on-site rock crushing (as amended), deferral of commerce-center development items to March 3, passage of several new business resolutions and a divided vote on a resolution related to an election-letter matter.

Highlights and outcomes

• Consent agenda (17 items): The board approved financial reports, minutes, department and commission reports and multiple dedication and plat-related resolutions (listed in the agenda packet). The consent agenda carried 8 to 0. Motion to approve the consent agenda was moved by Vice Mayor Pomeroy and seconded by Alderman Murray.

• Resolution 25-23 (interim permitting requirements for on-site rock crushing activities): The board approved Resolution 25-23 as amended (an amendment changed language in Exhibit A, section 8.4 from “shall” to “may” in specified lines and changed a 180-day permit term wording). The amendment carried unanimously 8 to 0 and the resolution as amended carried 8 to 0. Motion to approve by Vice Mayor Pomeroy; amendment moved by Alderman Fuquay and seconded by Alderman Linville.

• Resolution 25-24 (amendment to Spring Hill Commerce Center development agreement): The applicant requested deferral and staff recommended deferral; Alderman Pomeroy moved to defer Resolution 25-24 to the March 3 meeting. The motion to defer carried 8 to 0.

• Resolution 25-39 (resending/rescinding mayor’s letter regarding an election matter): Alderman Fuquay introduced the resolution; the board recorded a split vote. The transcript includes an inconsistent readback during roll call, but the final clarified tally recorded in the minutes was 5 to 2 to 1 (yes/no/abstain) as read into the record. (Transcript shows some confusion in the readback; see provenance for the full discussion.)

• Ordinance 24-20 (first reading amending conditions and master plan for Spring Hill Commerce Center): The first reading was deferred to March 3, 2025 by unanimous 8 to 0 vote.

• Resolution 25-55 (accept donation of park bench from GFWC): Approved unanimously 8 to 0.

• Resolution 25-56 (opposing Tennessee House Bill 0895 regarding the Duck River): Approved unanimously 8 to 0. Alderman Fuquay explained the resolution would align the city with other local governments along the Duck River.

• Resolution 25-57 (authorize staff to apply for State Revolving Loan Fund for water/sewer projects): The resolution carried 7 to 0 to 1 (passes); one member recorded as absent or recused in the roll call.

• Resolution 25-59 (call of performance bond for Kedron Square Phase 1B): The board adopted a staff-recommended amendment to convert most of the letter of credit to a 30% maintenance bond and require a separate cash-funded performance bond for the outstanding sidewalk/ADA/crosswalk work; the motion and amendment carried unanimously 8 to 0. (This item generated extended staff and developer discussion; separate article provides more detail.)

Procedure notes

- Several motions were moved by Vice Mayor Pomeroy and seconded by Alderman Murray; where roll-call tallies were read, the board recorded unanimous 8 to 0 for many items.

- Two items tied to the Spring Hill Commerce Center (Resolution 25-24 and Ordinance 24-20) were deferred to the board’s March 3 meeting at the applicant’s request and staff recommendation.

- The transcript shows a readback confusion on Resolution 25-39; the clerk and mayor clarified the tally and the record shows a final 5-2-1 result.

The meeting closed without additional new votes recorded that evening.