Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Dunedin City Commission, March 4, 2025 work session
Summary
A quick roundup of formal motions and outcomes from the March 4 Dunedin City Commission work session: consent agenda approved; Resolution 25‑07 (FY25 budget amendment) approved; FY25 vehicle and equipment replacement plan approved.
At the March 4, 2025 Dunedin City Commission work session the following formal votes and motions were recorded:
Consent agenda - Motion: Approve the consent agenda (board/committee appointments; award of a piggyback agreement to Roland LLC for sanitary sewer repair in the amount of $54,861; and other routine items). - Outcome: Approved unanimously by voice vote. - Vote details: Motion moved and seconded on the record; no public comments; Commission recorded unanimous "aye."
Resolution 25‑07 — FY25 second budget amendment - Motion: Approve Resolution 25‑07, amending the city’s FY25 operating and capital budget to carry forward encumbrances and project budgets from FY24 (net increase in appropriations reported by staff at approximately $47.4 million). - Outcome: Approved unanimously by roll call vote. - Vote record: Commissioner DeGard — Aye; Vice Mayor Gao — Aye; Commissioner Walker — Aye; Commissioner Sandbergen — Aye; Mayor Franey — Aye.
FY25 vehicle and equipment replacement plan (Agenda item 3B) - Motion: Approve the purchase and replacement of 24 vehicles and pieces of equipment for FY25, total expenditure $1,855,467.82, and authorize P.O.s as detailed in the staff report. - Outcome: Approved unanimously by roll call vote. - Vote record: Commissioner DeGard — Aye; Vice Mayor Gao — Aye; Commissioner Walker — Aye; Commissioner Sandbergen — Aye; Mayor Franey — Aye.
Notes: The work session also included a lengthy workshop on a proposed historic preservation ordinance and COA matrix update. That item generated extended public comment and detailed commissioner questions but did not include a formal commission vote; staff were directed to revise language and forward the revised draft to the Local Planning Agency for review with clarifications on the “extraordinary circumstances” language and outreach materials.
For full text of staff reports, motion language and attachments, see the meeting packet (attachments C–E for the budget amendment; asset lists and vendor quotes for the fleet item).
