Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Judge orders defendants to supplement discovery within 20 days in pool-construction dispute
Summary
In a residential pool-construction lawsuit, the court granted a plaintiffs' Rule 37 motion in part and ordered the defendants to supplement discovery responses within 20 days while encouraging mediation already scheduled next month.
A Montgomery County judge ordered defendants in a residential pool-construction and consumer-protection suit to supplement discovery responses within 20 days, after plaintiffs said the defendants' initial answers were "substantively deficient" and that settlement talks had not halted discovery.
Plaintiffs, represented by attorney Noel Bagwell, said their complaint alleges breach of contract, negligent construction and violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act arising from work on a Biodesign swimming pool. Bagwell told the court that the defendants had provided evasive or incomplete answers to written discovery and had…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
