Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments Services And Events topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press council on livestreaming to children’s app, Celebration of Lights costs and park maintenance
Summary
During public comment, residents asked the council for clarity on city services including street sweeping and fiber deployment, raised questions about the cost and contracting for the Celebration of Lights, and alleged that the city's livestream is available on YouTube Kids.
Residents used the meeting’s public-comment period to press the LaSalle City Council for clearer accounting on city events and services, to ask about park and traffic-safety measures and to raise concerns about the city's livestream being available on a children’s video platform.
Dina Hicks asked whether the city follows a formal route for street sweeping, questioned the status of a fiber-optic internet project and asked for a public accounting of the Celebration of Lights. Hicks said the city pays contractor "Ivan and Sons" $18,000 for what she described as "burning garbage" and another $4,000 to burn yard waste and asked whether the contractor performs other regular city work. "I just don't understand why we are paying them $18,000 to burn garbage," she said.
Brianne Hicks asked about playground-swing storage and safety checks, suggested converting the intersection of First and Marquette to a four-way stop because the signal has not functioned properly, and asked whether the city will resume an annual community cleanup and whether there are plans for the Kaskaskia and Maytag buildings. She also asked why some city ordinances appear enforced selectively and said the Celebration of Lights has lost "over $100,000" annually, a figure she asked the city to explain.
A third public commenter alleged the city’s livestream feeds are being posted to YouTube Kids and described a series of personal complaints about mayoral conduct and councilroom interactions. The commenter said she had asked the mayor to consult the city attorney on the livestream placement and said she had not received a response. The speaker attributed a number of offensive remarks and gestures to people present in the chamber; those allegations were presented as the speaker’s account.
City staff responded to some items during the meeting. Staff said the livestream was set up by the city's IT coordinator using the same vendor arrangement other nearby communities use, and that the city would review how the vendor configured the stream. On the Tri-County MOU later in the meeting, staff said Tri-County accepts appointments and does not take walk-ins and that the agency recently received grant funding to assist utility customers.
The council did not take formal action on the public comments; speakers were heard during the allotted public-comment period.
