Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes At A Glance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: code amendments to meet state permit timing rules approved; bylaws amendment postponed
Summary
At the meeting commission members voted unanimously to adopt proposed code modifications intended to comply with a state permit‑timing requirement and later unanimously approved a motion to postpone a bylaws amendment to the next meeting.
Two formal actions recorded on the transcript:
1) Code amendments to consolidate development processing and comply with state permit timing requirements The county received a short presentation of proposed changes to code to comply with a cited Senate Bill (transcript reference used the number "52 90"). Staff described the amendment as a three‑page clean‑up that shortens processing times for Type 1 and Type 2 permits and removes language about what can be excluded from processing time calculations. The commission moved, seconded and approved the proposal by roll call: Thomas Butler, Ron Long, Bonnie Booth, Katina Hester, Kent Riondo, Jane Heilman and the presiding member all voted yes. The motion carried.
2) Postponement of proposed bylaws amendment A commissioner moved to postpone a proposed bylaws amendment (which included an edited ex parte communications clause and other housekeeping changes) to the next meeting for further review and clarification. The motion to postpone carried by unanimous voice vote; the clerk recorded multiple “Aye” responses in support.
The transcript does not record ordinance/ordinance numbers or final codified titles for the first item; staff indicated the change affects three pages of county code and is intended to implement state processing requirements.
