Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Meeting Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners pause meeting after disruptive Zoom participants; legal counsel cites OPMA remedies
Summary
A Feb. 11 Clallam County commissioners meeting was interrupted by disruptive virtual participants. The board paused, IT restricted participant video/audio, legal counsel cited RCW 42.30.050 options and the commissioners recessed for 10 minutes before resuming with tighter controls.
Clallam County commissioners on Feb. 11 paused their meeting after disruptive video posts and on-screen images from virtual participants interfered with proceedings. The board recessed for 10 minutes, IT disabled participants’ ability to share video and audio, and county legal counsel advised the commissioners about remedies available under the state Open Public Meetings Act.
The disruption began during a bid/qualifications opening; commissioners and staff attempted technical fixes and then sought legal guidance. County legal counsel cited the Open Public Meetings Act and referenced the statute that allows a governing body to clear a meeting room, adjourn and reconvene elsewhere, or otherwise restore order when a meeting is made infeasible by disruptive participants. The counsel recommended a graduated response that uses the least restrictive means first, such as disabling video and muting participants, before taking stronger steps such as ending the virtual component.
A commissioner moved to recess for 10 minutes so IT and staff could address the problem; that motion was seconded and approved. When the meeting resumed, staff said they had turned off the ability for remote participants to show video, had disabled participants’ ability to share audio and were muting attendees by default. County counsel warned that if those measures failed, the board could shut down the Zoom portion of the meeting and continue in-person only.
The board and staff told remote participants that, if the virtual link were shut down to stop disruptions, members of the public wishing to comment could file written comments on the county website; staff also said the clerk could raise hands at the public‑comment period and unmute speakers individually.
No formal disciplinary action against any named individual is recorded in the minutes; the board’s actions on meeting security were operational (technical controls and a brief recess) and adopted without a formal continuing policy change at this meeting.
