Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adu Conditional Use Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hearing Examiner admits exhibits and signals approval to follow for two Kitsap County ADU conditional‑use applications
Summary
Kitsap County hearing examiner admitted hearing exhibits and indicated administrative approvals will be issued for two accessory dwelling unit conditional‑use permit applications after staff presentation; no public opposition was recorded at the hearings for the Brown and Litton files.
Kitsap County’s hearing examiner admitted the evidentiary exhibits and heard staff presentations for two separate conditional‑use permit requests for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) during the Feb. 27 session and indicated written approvals will follow administratively.
First, planner Izzy Lotz presented the Brown family ADU conditional‑use permit (file 24‑03313). Lotz said the application had been deemed complete, that a SEPA optional DNS process had been used (WAC 197‑11‑355), and that no public comments had been received. Lotz described the parcel, the proposed detached 900‑square‑foot ADU and attached garage, critical‑area mapping, access, and consistency with KCC 17.415.015.B (special ADU criteria). Exhibits 1–15 were admitted into the record; the applicant was sworn in but declined to comment. The examiner said he would issue the approval and asked parties to provide email contact information for the written decision.
Next, planner Kate Milward presented a second ADU application (file 24‑02627) for a detached ADU in Poulsbo. Milward said that application had also used an optional DNS process, that the parcel and proposed ADU conformed to the rural residential standards and ADU criteria in KCC 17.415.015.B, and that no public comments had been received. Exhibits 1–19 were admitted. The applicant was not present and no public testimony was offered. The examiner closed both hearings, noting that these applications are typically straightforward and that approvals would be issued.
Why it matters These two conditional‑use ADU permits were short agenda items that advanced routine housing objectives in Kitsap County, showing staff and the examiner follow a consistent process (completeness review, SEPA DNS where applicable, evidence admission, sworn testimony, and an administrative written decision). The hearing record shows county planners documenting compliance with ADU regulations and county health/stormwater requirements; the examiner’s statement that approvals will be issued indicates staff found the files met code standards.
Ending The examiner admitted exhibits and closed both hearings; written decisions will follow by administrative notice to the parties of record. The ADU approvals are administrative permit actions and did not include a council or commission vote at the public hearing on Feb. 27.
