Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consumer Protection Language Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Language‑access requirement for payday lenders stalls after trade group testimony and tied committee vote
Summary
Senate Bill 329 would have required payday lenders to provide subsequent communications in the same non‑English language used for the initial transaction. The bill was amended to remove rollovers and then tied in committee 3–3, leaving it unapproved.
Senate Bill 329, presented by Senator Pitcher, proposed that if an initial deferred‑deposit/payday loan transaction was conducted in a language other than English, subsequent required notices and communications should also be provided in that same language.
Why it matters: Advocates said the requirement would help non‑English speakers understand high‑cost short‑term loans and protect borrowers from misunderstandings. The sponsor said the change grew from an initial effort to address payday lending harms and then evolved to focus on language access.
The committee adopted an amendment that removed an automatic rollover provision from the bill. In testimony, industry representatives from the Utah Consumer Lending Association argued there was no demonstrated consumer need and that no complaints had been lodged with the regulator; they proposed instead a study to consider a broader, economy‑wide language requirement if warranted. Court Walker of the association said their members already post complaint numbers and that the industry had not seen requests or complaints that would justify a targeted requirement.
Senator Escamilla spoke in favor of the bill’s consumer‑protection goal, saying language clarity is a “basic courtesy” and a protection for both consumers and the industry. After discussion, the committee held a roll‑call vote that resulted in a 3–3 tie; the motion to favorably recommend SB329 therefore failed and the bill did not move out of committee.
