Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legislation Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Oklahoma House passes bills on utilities, insurance, non-opioid coverage and open meetings

2473493 · March 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Oklahoma House advanced a slate of bills on March 3, 2025, including measures on utilities franchise fees, insurance guarantee rules, non-opioid coverage for state employees and remote public meeting disclosures. Tallies and short summaries are below.

The Oklahoma House of Representatives advanced and passed multiple bills on Monday, March 3, 2025, during a floor session that included a mix of brief sponsor explanations and roll-call votes.

Below is an at-a-glance summary of bills discussed on the floor, each followed by a one-line description drawn from floor remarks and the official recorded vote.

• House Bill 10-89 (sponsor: Representative Culver) — Aligns state law with federal law on importation of out-of-state horse races. Vote: 86 ayes, 2 nays.

• House Bill 12-56 (sponsor: Representative Strom) — Allows fines and fees collected by the Construction Industries Board to be used for workforce development and career-tech programs beyond current recipients. Vote: 90 ayes, 4 nays.

• House Bill 13-73 (sponsor: Representative Bowles) — Adds statutory protections for landowners who host commercial solar facilities, including decommissioning protections. Vote: 94 ayes, 0 nays.

• House Bill 11-60 (sponsor: Representative Tedford) — Updates the property and casualty insurance guarantee process to include cybersecurity insurance and aligns the state with NAIC guidance; includes confidentiality provisions for certain records. Vote: 93 ayes, 2 nays.

• House Bill 16-07 (sponsor: Representative Guise) — Requires state agencies to report contract employee numbers and salaries using existing payroll software; sponsor said the bill increases transparency. Vote: 96 ayes, 0 nays.

• House Bill 14-16 (sponsor: Representative West, Josh) — Directs the state employee insurance program to avoid discouraging FDA‑approved non‑opioid treatments; sponsor said the bill is not a mandate but expands parity with Medicaid rules. Vote: 90 ayes, 7 nays (vote recorded as emergency roll call).

• House Bill 14-80 (sponsor: Representative West, Tammy) — Extends the fee-waiver process for youth and clarifies that parents/guardians cannot be charged duplicate detention costs. Vote: 91 ayes, 6 nays.

• House Bill 2402 (sponsor: Representative Fettgater) — Revenue and taxation measure introduced; sponsor moved adoption. Vote: 59 ayes, 33 nays.

• House Bill 12-20 (sponsor: Representative West, Kevin) — Seeks to prohibit municipalities from charging franchise fees and securitization amounts previously approved by the legislature; proponents said it limits municipal fees. Vote: 97 ayes, 0 nays; emergency declaration carried.

• House Bill 18-50 (sponsor: Representative Schreiber) — Trusts-related measure to codify common law and clarify trust treatment going forward; sponsor said it will not affect existing trusts. Vote: 79 ayes, 19 nays.

• House Bill 28-02 (sponsor: Representative Marty) — Expands state Board of Pharmacy authority to consider criminal pleas and convictions when licensing, aligning pharmacy parity with other health professions. Vote: 91 ayes, 7 nays.

• House Bill 15-76 (sponsor: Representative Lawson) — Directs Medicaid to cover rapid whole genome sequencing in specified clinical situations; sponsor argued it would improve diagnosis for critically ill patients. Vote: 83 ayes, 14 nays; emergency declaration on vote.

• House Bill 22-09 (sponsor: Representative Lay) — Modifies Open Meeting Act requirements for public officials participating remotely; sponsor said the bill clarifies disclosure requirements. Vote: 92 ayes, 5 nays.

A number of the bills were advanced from general order and passed on third reading with minimal floor debate; several were accompanied by short sponsor explanations and follow-up questions from members. Where sponsors yielded for questions, members asked for clarifications on scope, fiscal impact, or technical definitions.

Ending: The House adjourned after completing the series of votes and scheduled return for the following day.