Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County approves several Spearfish‑adjacent plats but declines to accept new right‑of‑way
Summary
The board authorized signatures on multiple final plats in the city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction but explicitly declined to accept additional right‑of‑way into county ownership, asking the highway superintendent to sign as highway authority with a written note that the county will not accept fee simple title.
Lawrence County commissioners authorized county signatures for several final plats inside or adjacent to the City of Spearfish’s extraterritorial jurisdiction, but the board specifically declined to accept new county right‑of‑way or to take fee simple ownership of additional road strips shown on the plats.
The plats included a final plat for Tract B (near Fentant Lane and Brookview Road), further subdivisions of Tract M1A, and Blue Sky Estates — all were described in staff presentations as being within the Spearfish ETJ and involving adjustments to approaches, right‑of‑way, or future road connections. County staff and commissioners repeatedly noted they will not accept additional county ownership of the dedicated right‑of‑way shown on the plats; instead, the highway superintendent was authorized to sign the board’s highway‑authority consent but a motion record stated the county would not take ownership of the dedications.
Commissioners discussed statutory issues around section‑line roads and whether dedications become county fee‑simple ownership by operation of law when plats are approved. County counsel and staff referenced state statute (RS 11‑3‑12 noted in the discussion) and advised caution; commissioners asked for the record to reflect the county’s intent not to take additional title. On Blue Sky Estates commissioners also discussed an 80‑foot public right‑of‑way the city had requested to reserve for a potential future Centennial Road connection; staff said the city would not require improvements now and that ownership and future improvements would be determined later.
The board approved motions for highway‑authority signatures on the plats with the recorded caveat that the county was not accepting additional right‑of‑way and with direction that staff continue to coordinate with the city on potential future road connections.
