Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Fire topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palm Springs fire chief presents master plan recommending station upgrades, staffing and response goals
Summary
The Palm Springs Fire Department presented a master plan recommending preservation or replacement of Fire Station 1, expansion at Station 3, a sixth station study for northeast growth, and performance targets tied to response times and staffing. Council received the report.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Fire topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palm Springs Fire Chief Paul Alvarado and consultant Stuart Gary presented a fire department master plan to the City Council on Feb. 27 that recommends preserving the Station 1 site, adding staffing to engines not yet at four-person crews, remodeling Station 3, and studying a sixth station in the city’s north/northeast as growth warrants.
The plan, commissioned by Chief Alvarado and prepared by City Gate Associates, frames fire and emergency medical service levels as local policy choices. Consultant Stuart Gary said the first unit should aim for a total response time — from the 9-1-1 call to wheel stop — of 8½ minutes for the first arriving unit and about 11–12 minutes for a full first-alarm force. Gary emphasized both “speed” (getting the first crew there quickly) and “weight” (getting sufficient crews on scene) as drivers of outcomes.
The consultants’ risk assessment noted Palm Springs’ roughly 46,000 permanent residents, a large seasonal visitor population, ongoing North City warehouse development north of current station reach, and an EMS workload that accounts for over two-thirds of calls. The study found existing dispatch and crew turnout times are “a little sluggish” compared with best practices and travel time is about one minute longer than the study’s 5-minute travel benchmark. The report said Station 1 is near the edge of its service life but in an effective location on the city’s road network; moving it produced net losses in coverage in model scenarios.
Recommendations presented to council included:
- Preserve and, where necessary, rebuild or expand the Station 1 site rather than relocating it to preserve response coverage. - Add a fourth firefighter position to the last engine that does not yet have four-person staffing. - Remodel and expand Station 3 (an EMS‑dense corridor north of downtown) and plan for a two‑person EMS squad there in the future. - Continue the reserve pumper fleet and add one reserve pumper. - Study acquisition for a potential sixth station in the North/Northeast parts of the city as development proceeds, but not as an immediate five‑year need. - Improve turnout and dispatch performance and adopt performance targets for council policy (8½‑minute first unit total response; multi‑unit first‑alarm force on scene in ~11–12 minutes).
Chief Alvarado told council he commissioned the study in his first year to assess deployment and staffing and said the department will work on the turnout recommendations and track metrics over the next five years. The report also recommended additional fire prevention staffing, centralized logistics and administrative support for headquarters, enhancements to the department training site, and coordination with the airport master plan regarding Station 2.
Council took no formal regulatory action beyond receiving the presentation and discussing next steps; the consultant and chief were directed to return with performance measures and budget planning to support staffing and facility work.
The consultant and chief emphasized the plan is a policy framework for council decisions, not a state or federal mandate, and that growth and development will drive timing and scale of capital and staffing needs.

