Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Washington residential energy TAG keeps several 2021 state requirements, rejects some 2024 IECC changes

2458428 · February 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Washington State Residential Energy Code technical advisory group reviewed the integrated draft combining the 2024 IECC and the 2021 Washington State Energy Code and voted to keep several 2021 state provisions while rejecting some 2024 IECC provisions; the resulting integrated draft will be the base document for public code-change proposals.

The Washington State Residential Energy Code technical advisory group met virtually to review the integrated draft that will form the baseline for 2024 code proposals and to vote on whether to carry forward specific 2024 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) provisions or keep the Washington 2021 state language.

The TAG, chaired by Kjell Anderson of the Washington State Building Code Council, spent the meeting reviewing the integrated draft — staff’s mash-up of the 2021 Washington State Energy Code and the 2024 IECC — and taking motions on draft wording and several substantive technical items that will affect the baseline document released by the Building Code Council for public proposals.

Why it matters: the integrated draft becomes the base document on which code-change proposals will be filed. Retaining 2021 state language — rather than adopting corresponding 2024 IECC language — preserves the existing baseline that local code officials, builders and utilities use. That choice changes which proposals are needed to achieve tighter energy performance or to allow trade-offs.

Key outcomes

- The TAG approved its meeting agenda and proceeded to a line-by-line review of the integrated draft.

- The group voted to revert the R101.3 intent language to the 2021 Washington State Energy Code wording rather than adopt the IECC intent language (motion by Kim Barker; passed). TAG members argued the IECC intent text could conflict with state…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans