Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Montana panel hears hours of testimony on bill to ban union security agreements
Summary
Senate Bill 376, a proposal to ban union security agreements and bar compelled financial support for unions, drew more than three hours of testimony alongside opposing legal and economic arguments.
Helena — The Montana Senate Business, Labor and Economic Affairs Committee spent much of the day hearing pro and con testimony on Senate Bill 376, a Right-to-Work measure introduced by Sen. Mark Noland that would prohibit employers and unions from requiring employees to join or financially support a union as a condition of employment.
Supporters told the committee the bill would protect individual choice, encourage private-sector growth and raise household income, while opponents—including a broad coalition of construction, electrical, health-care and municipal unions—argued the measure would undercut collective bargaining, weaken apprenticeship training and lower wages.
Sen. Mark Noland (R), the bill sponsor, framed SB 376 as a freedom measure that would prevent an employer or union from penalizing a worker for refusing to pay union dues. “A right to work law simply ensures that no worker is compelled to pay,” Noland said during his opening remarks. He cited comparative statistics he and proponents attributed to outside researchers showing higher disposable income and faster private‑sector employment growth in…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
