Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District projects multi-year budget gap, enrollment decline and pension pressures; staff outlines timeline
Summary
Business official presented the district's first-interim budget projections showing a small current-year deficit, built-in COLA estimates of 2.43% for next year, rising pension costs and a seven-year decline of about 589 students.
Get email alerts on the District Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marilyn Edenton, the district's business official, presented an overview of the San Ysidro School District's current budget assumptions and multi-year projection at the board meeting.
Lede: The district projects deficit spending in its multi-year financial forecast driven by lower enrollment, rising pension costs and insufficient state cost-of-living adjustments, staff said.
Nut graf: At first interim the district estimated $92.7 million in total revenue, with Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) revenue accounting for roughly 70 percent of the general fund; staff said general fund expenditures were estimated at $87.0 million and that salaries and benefits make up about 72 percent of the general fund. Edenton told the board the district built a 2.43 percent COLA for the next fiscal year in its projection, but she said many districts believe 4 percent is closer to what is needed to cover salary-step and column increases.
Supporting details
- Enrollment and revenue: Edenton said current enrollment is 4,144 students, a decline of 61 students for the year, and a seven-year decline of about 589 students (she noted a seven-year revenue loss estimate of about $6.4 million). The current-year enrollment change equates to a roughly $700,000 to $900,000 LCFF revenue reduction versus prior projection.
- Pensions and benefits: Employer rates for STRS and PERS are rising; the district included employer STRS at 19.1 percent and expects PERS employer rates to continue increasing. Edenton said pension and health/welfare increases contributed roughly $300,000 in near-term pressure and a cumulative $7.2 million increase since 2013-14.
- Special education and federal funding: The district estimated special-education costs at about $13 million, with a general-fund contribution of $6 million to $7 million annually and roughly $1 million of projected annual special-education cost growth. Edenton listed several federal funding streams that could be at risk (Title I, Title II, Title III, Title IV, federal special-education allocations and National School Lunch Program funding) and gave rough annual amounts the district currently receives or could lose (for example, roughly $2.6 million for the National School Lunch Program and $1.1 million for the federal portion of special education). She said the district had fully spent one-time federal stimulus funds and learning recovery block grants that had been supporting staffing.
- Prior-year liabilities: Edenton summarized several inherited liabilities the district has resolved, including repayment of prior overstatements and completed debt service on several loans using Measure T proceeds.
Board questions and next steps
Board members asked for enrollment-comparison data with neighboring districts and for more detail on transfer-in/transfer-out counts; staff said those comparisons could be provided. The district's proposed budget and Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) schedule remains on the usual cycle: second interim on March 13, public hearings in June, adoption in June and submission to county in July.
Ending
Edenton said staff will return with second-interim updates and more comparative enrollment data; the board will consider required layoff notices and budget resolutions in the March and subsequent meetings.

