Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Deltona special magistrate issues orders across multiple code-enforcement cases
Summary
At a Feb. 26 special magistrate hearing, the City of Deltona issued compliance deadlines, continued some matters and imposed running fines where prior orders were not met. The magistrate also dismissed one boarded-window case after finding the cited ordinance did not apply.
The City of Deltona's special magistrate on Feb. 26 issued written orders in a series of code-enforcement and fire-safety cases, directing property owners to obtain permits, correct violations and, in several instances, imposing daily fines that will accrue until compliance is verified.
The magistrate opened the hearing by explaining the process and appeal rights under Florida Statutes chapter 162 and then heard more than a dozen property-specific matters brought by city code and fire inspectors. Most rulings required owners or their agents to obtain permits or remove items that violate the City of Deltona code; several cases were continued or dismissed when the cited ordinance did not apply.
Why this matters: the orders set enforceable deadlines and monetary penalties that can become liens if unpaid, affecting homeowners, rental-property operators and small businesses in Deltona.
The hearing covered both building-permit violations (unpermitted roofing, garage conversions, sheds, and after-the-fact plumbing work) and vehicle/storage infractions, plus fire-code violations at commercial properties. In many cases officers produced photographs and permit records; respondents either described steps taken to secure permits or explained circumstances such as medical emergencies or contractor licensing issues.
Notable rulings and directions included a ruling authorizing a city foreclosure process in a long-running lien matter, and an order finding Deltona House Rentals, Inc., in violation for an unpermitted water-heater installation at 821 Cortland Boulevard. Code Compliance Officer Sashan Gregory presented the Cortland case and the magistrate set a compliance deadline: "Respondent must correct the violation before 4:00 p.m. on April 14, 2025," the magistrate said, and warned that a $25-per-day fine would begin if the order is not met. Respondent Jeremy Hill told the magistrate his contractor had submitted an application and said, "we…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

