Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the H137 Studies And Genetic Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews studies and genetic‑privacy tweaks in H.137; staff to revise draft
Summary
Legislative Council and DFR proposed minor timing and language changes to H.137 outside the kiosk provisions: two consumer‑protection studies will be delayed and reframed, and a genetic‑privacy clause was clarified to emphasize preventing unfair genetic discrimination.
Legislative Council staff on Feb. 28 walked the Vermont House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development through non‑kiosk provisions in draft 1.5 of H.137, including changes to study deadlines and clarifications to a genetic‑privacy proposal; committee members accepted the suggested edits and instructed staff to fold them into the redraft of the bill.
The staff presentation noted two study changes requested after DFR asked for additional time. For a study on consumer protections related to transaction holds when fraud is suspected, staff proposed replacing a November 15 final report requirement with an earlier status report to committee chairs (preliminary findings and recommendations), allowing for a draft legislative request by December and a final report by Jan. 15. A parallel timing change was suggested for a study on coerced debt. Committee members questioned the need for a preliminary report if there already was a vehicle (a bill) to address coerced debt; members agreed that in that case a single final report by Jan. 15 would suffice.
On genetic privacy, staff said DFR requested clarifying language to specify that the proposed restriction targets unfair genetic discrimination tied to results from direct‑to‑consumer genetic testing companies, and to make clear that insurers would generally need consumer consent before sharing a consumer’s genetic test information. Maria Royal (Legislative Council) described those as “good suggestions.” Mary Bloch was recorded as having requested the genetic language earlier.
Committee direction and next steps
Committee members accepted the study deadline changes and the genetic‑privacy clarifications during the H.137 review. Staff was directed to incorporate these edits into the bill redraft that will be circulated to the committee and returned for further consideration alongside other pending changes.
What was not decided
The committee did not set new statutory language beyond the clarifications presented, nor did it record a formal roll‑call vote on the study‑timeline or genetic‑privacy edits. The committee will consider the revised draft when Legislative Council completes the redraft and reconvenes the panel for a formal vote.
