Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administrative Approvals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning and Zoning Commission approves minutes and three sign-and-paint applications

2443885 · February 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Royal Palm Beach Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 25 approved minutes from its Jan. 28 meeting and granted architectural approvals for a building repaint and two signage changes at commercial properties, all by unanimous votes.

Vice Chairman Kamar Williams presided over the Royal Palm Beach Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Feb. 25, where the commission unanimously approved the previous meeting minutes and three routine architectural applications.

The commission approved the minutes from its Jan. 28 meeting on a motion by Commissioner Andrew Alba, seconded by Commissioner David Leland; the motion carried, 5-0.

In separate votes, the commission granted architectural approval to Royal Palm Floor Supply LLC to repaint an existing building at 11378 Okeechobee Boulevard, approved relocation of a Costco canopy sign for the property at 11001 Southern Boulevard, and approved wall signage for a Wingstop at 1128 Royal Palm Beach Boulevard, Unit B128. All three motions passed unanimously, 5-0.

Staff presentations described each application in turn and recommended approval. For the repaint, staff said the proposed colors are SW 7004 Snowbound for the building body and SW 7069 Iron Ore for the trim. For the Costco item staff showed existing and proposed canopy sign locations; the applicant representative stated the request simply relocates the canopy signage from the south to the north elevation. For the Wingstop sign staff noted the design incorporates the trademarked white-and-green color scheme and recommended approval.

No members of the public spoke on these items during the meeting’s public-comment periods, and commissioners raised no substantive concerns before voting.

The approvals were processed as architectural applications; staff will carry the approvals forward according to the village’s permitting procedures.

The commission adjourned the business for these items and proceeded to other agenda matters.