Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wellness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee updates wellness policy after triennial review; seeks clearer language on recess and 'logical consequences'
Summary
The policy committee advanced revisions to Policy 246 following the USDA triennial assessment, adding farm‑to‑table practices and language intended to limit withholding physical activity; members asked staff to remove or define 'logical consequence' and to add implementation guidance so recess is not used as punishment.
The Haverford Township School District policy committee reviewed proposed updates to Policy 246 (wellness) that resulted from the district’s triennial assessment using the USDA assessment tool. Committee members supported two additions recommended by the wellness committee: (1) language recognizing the district’s farm‑to‑table activities (for example, school gardens) and (2) a provision to avoid withholding physical activity such as recess, except where there is a potential safety risk.
Members pressed for clearer wording on the policy’s reference to “logical consequences,” a term they said is used in Responsive Classroom training at the elementary level. Several committee members worried that without a definition or examples, the phrase could be interpreted in practice to justify routinely taking recess away as punishment. The wellness committee’s representative said principals prefer the term because it aligns with staff training, but the committee directed staff to either remove the phrase or add a definition and suggested step‑by‑step guidance (for example, alternative activities or stages of response) so schools do not default to removing recess.
Staff noted the district must still comply with a state mandate to measure BMI in students; several members expressed opposition to that mandate but acknowledged the policy cannot change state requirements. Members also asked for minor copy edits (typos in “field trip” and duplicated characters) and suggested adding definitions and cross‑references to related district policies such as harassment and booster/club guidance.
No formal vote was recorded; the committee instructed staff to incorporate clearer language on safety exceptions, either remove or define “logical consequence,” add examples or procedural steps for building staff, and correct typographical errors before forwarding the policy to the full board for a first reading.
