Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Appeals Standing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee seeks narrower appeals language to preserve adjacent‑owner standing and limit broader third‑party suits
Summary
Members flagged drafting that unintentionally altered standing for adjacent property owners and directed Legislative Council to redraft so owners next to a project retain existing standing while other parties must show particularized injury.
The House Committee on General & Housing spent part of its Feb. 20 meeting reviewing appeals and standing language in draft 5.1 of the committee’s housing bill and instructed Legislative Council to revise the draft to reflect the committee’s intent.
Committee members said their intent was to leave intact the current standing for property owners adjacent to a project while tightening the category of "everybody else" so that parties farther away must demonstrate a particularized or polarized interest before bringing suit. Committee members raised a drafting error that, as written in the latest posted draft, could be read to change the standard for adjacent property owners; members asked counsel to preserve existing law for adjacent owners and to draft a clearer rule for other third parties.
The committee also discussed a request to codify a judicial opinion (referred to in the transcript as the judge’s written opinion) and asked Legislative Council to prepare statutory language that would accomplish the committee’s policy direction. Members asked to see the opinion and to have counsel translate the case law into statutory text that narrows, rather than broadens, standing.
Legislative Council and committee members agreed to refine the draft language and circulate a revised draft for committee review prior to the committee’s next session.
Ending: The committee asked Legislative Council to provide redrafted language that preserves adjacent‑owner standing, requires third parties to demonstrate particularized interest, and incorporates a narrow codification of the cited judicial guidance.
