Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House committee hears bill to create working group on child and parent legal representation

2439974 · February 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A House committee on Feb. 27 heard testimony on H.193, a bill to create a Child and Parent Legal Representation Working Group to design an interdisciplinary system for representing children, parents, custodians and guardians involved in Vermont child protection (CHINS) proceedings.

A House committee on Feb. 27 heard testimony on H.193, a bill to create a Child and Parent Legal Representation Working Group to design an interdisciplinary system for representing children, parents, custodians and guardians involved in Vermont child protection (CHINS) proceedings. The bill sets membership, a timeline for work and a one‑time appropriation to cover per diem payments and reimbursements.

The bill, introduced to the House Human Services Committee, would require the group to propose an administrative structure and recommended compensation levels for attorneys and social service personnel, identify federal funding (including Title IV‑E) that could support the system, and produce performance standards and training requirements. It directs the chief justice of the Vermont Supreme Court to call the first meeting on or before Aug. 1, requires a report by Dec. 15 to the House Human Services Committee (and the Senate counterpart), and terminates the working group on Jan. 15 of the following year.

Why it matters: supporters said the change could produce better legal representation, reduce time children spend in foster care, and unlock federal Title IV‑E matching funds that Vermont is currently not capturing. Opponents and several committee members pressed the bill’s sponsors and witnesses on membership (notably whether legislators should serve), the modest appropriation for member per diems, and whether the statutory language should require the working group to “consider” versus…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans