Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Technology Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates Yondr‑style cell phone storage; $20,000 placeholder in budget draws scrutiny
Summary
Board members and staff discussed a $20,000 budget placeholder for Yondr‑style cell phone storage at the high school, operational challenges and alternate approaches; some trustees objected to earmarking the money when instructional programs face cuts.
The board discussed a proposal to add a one‑time $20,000 budget line for Yondr‑style cell phone storage devices at the high school and raised operational, policy and cost questions.
Jean (staff member) summarized the item as an equipment and implementation package. "$20,000 would be the cost of the bags themselves, the equipment that, opens and closes them at the beginning and end of the day, as well as they recommend buying 10% more so that you have them in case they're damaged or, to your point, Jenny, they show up without it, you put it in another one and they carry that around all day," Jean said. She also noted that Governor Hochul’s budget included funding for phone‑management options and that the state is leaving implementation to local control.
Why it matters: Proponents said device storage could reduce classroom distraction and increase student socialization; opponents worried about cost, recurring replacement needs and policy implications of restricting access to personal property during the school day.
Key points from the discussion - Cost and recurrence: Board members calculated roughly $30 per student and noted recurring replacement costs as cohorts graduate; staff estimated $3,000–$5,000 in replacement costs annually for wear and obsolescence. - Operational questions: Trustees asked who would manage the drop‑off/pick‑up process and how compliance would be enforced; staff said building‑level plans and BLT work are underway but warned it could require added adult supervision during morning entry. - Alternatives and state funding: Jean said the governor’s proposal provides funding and local control; trustees discussed other options such as locker storage, classroom deposit boxes and enforcement of existing policies rather than district‑purchased hardware.
Board reaction - Several trustees said $20,000 felt large compared with cuts or unfilled positions elsewhere in the budget and asked staff to pursue additional information from other districts with implemented programs before committing funds; one trustee said, "$20,000 to me feels like a very large number for something like cell phone storage." Another trustee suggested inviting representatives from neighboring districts that have implemented phone‑management systems to share operational lessons.
Ending: The board did not approve the purchase; staff will gather comparative district experiences, clarify recurring costs and report back. Trustees emphasized policy and operational analysis should precede any budget commitment.
