Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pension And Retiree Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant lays out options to prefund retiree health liability; board to consider trustee and trust choices
Summary
A consultant presented scenarios and trade-offs for prefunding the district’s other post-employment benefit (OPEB) liability. Trustees asked for more information and for staff to return with trust-options analysis.
A consultant presented the Galt Joint Union Elementary School District with options to prefund retiree health (OPEB) liabilities and described the trade-offs among investment allocations, expected returns and longer-term contributions.
Luis (presenting remotely) said the district has an accrued OPEB liability of about $6,300,000 on its financial statements and outlined the difference between ‘‘pay-as-you-go’’ and prefunding via an irrevocable trust. He explained that prefunding can reduce the reported liability because invested assets earn returns that allow use of a higher discount rate in actuarial calculations. Luis presented three modeled investment return scenarios (conservative ~5.5 percent; moderate ~6 percent; aggressive ~6.5 percent) and showed 20-year illustrations comparing cumulative pay-as-you-go expenditures versus prefunding contributions plus the assets that would accumulate under each assumed return.
Under the example calculations, paying benefits as they come over 20 years resulted in roughly $10.2 million in nominal payments with no assets set aside; a prefunding strategy produced higher total contributions over 20 years (estimates shown in the presentation) but left an asset pool that could be used for future retiree-health payments (examples given: $11,000,000 in trust assets under one scenario). Luis emphasized that prefunding is beneficial when a district expects to keep the assets dedicated to retiree benefits and can accept the limits of an irrevocable trust (assets generally available only to pay retiree health costs).
Trust selection and investment allocation are decisions the district must make; staff noted some trusts have more investment options and that contribution amounts and investment strategies can be changed after a trust is established. Trustees asked for follow-up documents comparing trust options and for specifics on how a prefunding schedule could fit within the district’s budgeting choices; staff said they will return with additional information and options.
Ending: No formal action was taken; staff will bring further analysis on trust types, funding scenarios and possible next steps for board consideration.
