Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cyber Pivot Act topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Homeland Security committee advances Cyber Pivot Act (HR 1000) to bolster cyber workforce; passes 17-8
Summary
The committee voted 17-8 to favorably report HR 1000, the Cyber Pivot Act, a skills-based scholarship and internship program intended to expand entry-level cybersecurity talent from community colleges and technical schools. Members debated implementation concerns given recent federal hiring freezes and personnel changes at agencies such as CISA.
The House Committee on Homeland Security voted to favorably report HR 1000, known as the Cyber Pivot Act, sending the bill toward consideration by the full House after a recorded committee vote of 17 yeas to 8 nays.
The Cyber Pivot Act would direct the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and DHS to establish scholarship and internship pathways that prioritize skills-based training at community colleges, technical schools and similar institutions to build a pipeline of entry-level cyber workers prepared to serve at federal, state, local or private-sector employers.
Chairman Green framed the bill as a bipartisan practical measure to address the nation's shortage of cybersecurity professionals, noting the earlier committee passage in the previous Congress and saying, "Cybersecurity is often viewed as 1 of the bipartisan areas where congress can get things done." Supporters argued the bill creates alternative pathways for students who do not pursue four-year degrees and expands internship opportunities in rural and high-risk critical infrastructure sectors.
Opponents, led by Representative Thompson, the ranking member, said the bill is currently unworkable under the administration's recent personnel actions. Thompson said, "I cannot ask people to make a 2 year commitment to government service when the federal government is under hiring freeze and when a participant would be arbitrarily fired by a 19 year old Musk protege," citing recent mass terminations and hiring freezes as evidence that promised federal positions might not exist. Several Democrats and some Republicans raised concerns about funding and whether CISA has the staffing and money to implement the program.
Other members spoke in favor of the bill as a workforce and national security measure. Representative Jimenez emphasized the national shortage of cyber professionals and urged support, while Representative McCall and others noted the bill had previously carried bipartisan support.
The committee recorded a roll-call vote on the motion to favorably report the bill. The clerk reported the tally as 17 ayes and 8 nos; the committee chair announced the ayes had it and the motion was agreed to. The committee did not specify an implementation date in the markup; the bill must proceed through subsequent House steps to become law.
Ending note: Supporters said the bill expands opportunities for students and employers to address a gap of skilled cyber workers; critics said the bill's success depends on a stable federal workforce and available funding.
