Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works Water Tower topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves water-tower contracts; members debate selling advertising or naming rights
Summary
River Falls approved contract awards for water-tower reconditioning and construction/project management and debated whether the city should market water-tower space or sell naming/advertising rights to raise revenue.
Get email alerts on the Public Works Water Tower topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The River Falls City Council approved consent-agenda resolutions awarding a reconditioning contract and a construction/project-management contract for a city water tower and later approved an amendment to the consent agenda that allowed those two items to proceed.
Council member Buerk pulled two consent-agenda items to ask whether the council had pursued marketing or revenue-generation options — such as selling naming or limited advertising rights — for water towers. A staff member said there had not been a council consensus to pursue alternative painting or advertising; staff recounted that at least one business had approached the city wanting an exclusive logo placement but staff believed that proposal was unlikely to get support. The staff member said the lack of further work on advertising was due to priorities, not opposition to particular products.
Council members offered competing views on whether marketing space should be openly available. One member noted the university’s prior arrangement for the south-side water tower and said the university’s status as a large employer could justify similar treatment; another member warned that multiple logos could make towers look "junky" and could create perceived inequities among local businesses. The discussion ended with a council member moving to approve the two pulled items as written; another council member seconded, and the motion passed with the voices present recorded as "Aye." The consent-agenda items were awarded to Clear Creek Coatings LTD for reconditioning and to Short Elliott and Hendrickson for construction and project management (as listed in the consent agenda text).
The council also approved other consent-agenda items (purchase of a 2015 Ford Super Duty F-350 from Ewald Automotive Group and an amendment to the first right of refusal for Sterling Ponds) as part of the meeting’s consent business; a separate motion initially included items 2, 3, 5 and 6, then was amended to approve items 2, 3 and 6 before items 4 and 5 were separately considered and approved after discussion.
Why this matters: The awards move forward scheduled maintenance and management of a city water tower; the discussion flagged a policy question for future consideration about whether the city should actively market municipal features for revenue or preserve a non-commercial visual standard for public infrastructure. The transcript does not show any formal policy change or staff directive to develop a marketing program during the meeting.

