Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Hospitals, clinics and insurers disagree on 340B fixes as Vermont considers H.266
Summary
Testimony on H.266 centered on manufacturers’ restrictions to the federal 340B program. Hospitals and community health centers said lost 340B revenue forced service cuts and higher commercial rate requests; insurers warned that bill language imposing insurer reporting or liability risks would be counterproductive.
Lawmakers heard competing testimony on H.266, a bill aimed at preserving access to federal 340B drug discounts for covered entities, including hospitals and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Hospital and clinic leaders said manufacturer restrictions on 340B contract pharmacies have sharply reduced revenue and forced difficult program and rate decisions; insurer representatives urged the committee to remove provisions that would impose new reporting or liability requirements on health plans.
Jordan Esty, director of government affairs for MVP Health Care, told the committee that insurers are not party to the 340B program and generally cannot determine from claims whether a drug was acquired under 340B. “This is a manufacturer and a provider program,” Esty said, adding that insurers do not have access to purchase-discount information and that proposed lawsuit or “interference” provisions aimed at insurers could create unintended…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

